IN MIDDLE-EAST RUSSIA IS FILLING GAPS LEFT BLANK BY THE U.S. Russia is progressively observed as a more solid accomplice in the Middle East than the USA, especially after the USA’s deserting of its Kurdish partners has made uncertainty about USA’s duty to its other local partners.

During its ongoing withdrawal from the upper east Syria, the USA has either purged or pulverized some military stations and bases in the upper east Syria, which the Russian powers are presently dominating. It appears that Russian powers are filling in the holes that are left clear by the USA’s Syria-withdrawal just as a relinquishment of Kurdish partners.


Czarist Russia had longstanding interests in the Middle East. Its successor, the Soviet Association (USSR), quickly rose as a basic player in the locale after the Subsequent World War and, all the more explicitly, during the Cold War period when the Soviets were all-inclusive occupied with an exceptional challenge with the West and, specifically, the USA.

The disintegration of the Soviet Association in 1991 remaining Moscow with next to no impact and stature in the Middle East. From that point forward, this ruin constantly dismayed Russian authority that constantly desired for a more noteworthy job in the area.

From 2011 and forward, the beginning of the (progressing) Syrian civil war had furnished Russia with a brilliant chance to enter all the more legitimately into the provincial geopolitical scene. As needs are, Russian President Vladimir Putin has misused this chance to the most extreme. With the kindness of Russian powers’ contribution in the Syrian common war, Russia has now settled itself as a significant geopolitical player in the locale and has situated itself to keep on being a significant player for quite a while to come.

Various components could empower Russia to rule territorial scene for quite a while to come. Russia’s military may, eagerness to supply arms to the provincial nations with no condition appended, developing conciliatory reach to practically all sides of the continuous questions, and dependability to spare partners.


The weaponry and military equipment that Moscow has brought in the Syrian theatre from the very beginning hinted a clear Russian intent to stay in the country for a longer period of time.

Russia has brought-in its best state-of-art defense-system like S-400 surface-to-air missile (SAM) anti-aircraft/missile system.

In addition to SAMs and airspace control, Russia has also deployed the tactical ballistic, cruise missiles and anti-ship missiles.

Russia has even sent its only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, on the Mediterranean. 


Moreover, Moscow has positioned itself as the ‘arms supplier of choice’ for the region.

Russia’s S-400 is now in great demand in the region. Turkey already acquired it and many other regional countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have shown interest in acquiring it.

Therefore, Russia’s share in the regional arms market is gradually increasing. As it provides a decent quality product at a much cheaper price with no questions asked. As opposed to the USA’s military hardware that is very expensive and comes with lots of Do’s and Don’ts list. That’s why both Algeria and Egypt are acquiring arms worth billions of dollars from Russia.


Moscow presently plainly uses more prominent viability, adjust and help shape – as opposed to attempting futile to force – results.

Dissimilar to the USA which has constantly separated the locale into partners and enemies. Russia has adopted a down to earth strategy which is satisfying great profits.

On the contrary, it is just Russia that has the capacity as of right now to interface with the territorial state. Indeed, Israel is also challenging Moscow.


Russia has transformed the battlefield, saved its allies. And established itself as a reliable partner which can always be banked upon.

Moreover, Moscow presented itself as an ally which believed in maintaining the current status quo for traditional Middle Eastern leaders.


  • The USA had utilized both military and discretionary instruments to become the prevailing player in the area. Russia has been utilizing a similar blend yet in its very own inventive way.
  • For long, it has been Russia’s fundamental geopolitical objective to make a ‘multipolar world’, supplanting the USA-ruled ‘unipolar world request’. Russia’s activities in the Middle East are more prominent geopolitical contention with the USA. Infact, the Middle East is likely the main area – outside the previous USSR/Soviet-Association nations. Where Russia has been the best in merging its impact at the USA’s cost.
  • The [USA’s politicians] plainly do not have an accord about what are the USA’s objectives and interests in the Middle East, not to mention how best to verify them.

This article was originally published on Oped Column Syndication.

Manish Rai is a columnist for the Middle East and Af-Pak region and Editor of geopolitical news agency Views around.

Read more Click here.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here